HomeDrawingsPhotographyCommissionsLinksAbout the Artist
YellowstoneGrand TetonsMontanaTri-StateTravelMyEquipment

My Equipment

Cameras

Lenses

Accessories

Digital
Photography

Supporting Cast



Contact Me
Contact Me

Cameras

Cameras get more attention than any other piece of photographic equipment and I am an admitted camera junkie. I have purchased the best quality camera bodies that I could afford. My most recent purchase is the Canon EOS 20D. After waiting for 3 years for the price to drop, I finally made the plunge.

I no longer use my film cameras so I've taken them off this page. It's sad to see things fade into history, but that is the reality for the film cameras in most photographer's collections. Do I miss them, sure, but mostly from a nostalgia of all the great shots I somehow managed to procure with them. They were fast, efficient, and presented a bit of a mystery... was there anything more exciting than cracking open that newly developed sleeve of slides and popping them onto the light table to see what was captured? Oh well, enough reminiscing - on to the cameras.

Canon 20D
Canon EOS 20D
Panasonic LZ7
Panasonic Lumix LZ7
Katz Eye Focusing screen for the Canon 20D
Katz Eye Focusing Screen for 20D
(see below for description)
Product 96676
Canon Powershot G2

Katz Eye Focusing Screen for Canon 20D

If you used to use a traditional SLR camera and like the concept of a split prism for manually focusing or checking the autofocus of an autofocus camera, I highly recommend the Katz Eye focusing screen. I'll add a caveat that installing it is not for the faint of heart -- if you don't have steady hands, a good dose of patience, and a little steely nerve, I would still recommend it but only if you have a camera service center install it for you. The link above shows the screen as it looks through the viewfinder and I can attest that it really does add functionality to my camera that I always felt was lacking before.

Back to Top


Lenses

Lenses are where photography and photographic discussions should really concentrate. The camera, as many others have pointed out, is really only a light-capturing device. The lens affects all other aspects of the process from sharpness, field-of-view, and the ability to capture sufficient light. I have slowly collected the best lenses I could save enough for. These were added one by one over several years. My most recent purchase (although it should have been one of my first) was the 50mm f/1.5 USM, one of the fastest and sharpest lenses I have used.

Canon 50mm f/1.4 USM
Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM

16-35mm f/2.8L

Canon EF 16-35 f/2.8L USM

28-70mm f/2.8L

Canon EF 28-70 f/2.8L USM

70-200mm f/2.8L

Canon EF 70-200 f/2.8L USM

300mm f/4.0L

Canon EF 300mm f/4.0L USM

1.4x Converter

Canon EF Extender 1.4x

Back to Top


The Clear Advantages of Digital Photography

Immediate Feedback

If being able to review the results of pressing the shutter button were the only advantage of digital photography, it would still be worth the extra expense of owning a digital camera. Fortunately, it is only one of many advantages and one that presents a clear advantage of film. Add in the increasingly useful information provided by histograms, in-camera white point balancing, and a host of other features and it becomes a playground of often times confusing, but an amazingly rich shooting experience.

RAW Shooting

There was confusion when digital cameras were first introduced about the real advantages of RAW shooting. Some photographers sought some sort of magical advantage when comparing their captured images to JPG versions. Once the information about the way RAW information was stored was broadly understood, the majority of photographers began to see the real advantages of digital photography.

For those not familiar with the concept, a RAW image is an unprocessed file format that contains the "raw" information the sensor captured during the exposure. There is no white point applied, no compression, etc. Basically, you have a file that recreates the moment of light entering the lens. By using various programs (my favorite is Adobe's Camera RAW), the photographer is able to "develop" the image without changing the original RAW image. Any modifications made to the photo are added to a separate file with no pixel-level changes actually occurring. If they decide to modify the photo at a later time using a different program, a different interpretation of the scene, or with different color balance, these changes are remade to the original image, not tacked onto existing changes.

Another way photographers talk about RAW is to simply say what it isn't: RAW files are not JPG images. JPG images have very significant changes made to the file as it is processed by the camera. Color balance, saturation, contrast, sharpening, etc. are all "baked" into an 8-bit image. If you decide to change one of these features, you are modifying a modified version of the file, cutting off and losing information with every slider bar change. You can always develop a RAW image to look like a JPG, in fact you can develop it to look like 2 dozen other JPG images, but you can never develop a JPG image to look like another without losing information in the file. Will it be good enough to print and have someone ooh and aah over it? Probably. But do you really need to take that chance with a once-in-a-lifetime shot of a Yeti running across a highway in the backwoods of Washington state?

So, what's there to miss?

Are the other advantages to shooting digital? Sure, but they become subjective for me after the two topics mentioned above. I really like the personality of different slide films. I can manufacture those effects with RAW images but it's an artificial step. Aren't RAW images more flexible? Without question. Do they provide great dynamic range, clarity, and technical detail? Yup! Do I still miss slides? Sadly, yes. I hated scanning dozens of frames and hand-spotting every single image to get a usable photo, but hey! it was about the process. You were forced to make really tough decisions about time investment and what you thought the image was capable of. Now you just dump several hundred RAW images into a folder and then open a photo viewing application and start the process of sorting through them. There's a loss of immediacy with the digital versions. Adobe Lightroom has done a lot to change the experience, but there is still a ways to go to make it an enjoyable experience and one that is as exciting as putting your eye to a loupe and seeing that slide pop under the backlighting of a light table (ohhh, my back is killing me).

Back to Top


Supporting Cast

Probably the most significant tool for anyone shooting serious landscape or wildlife photography is a good tripod. It doesn't have to be pretty or expensive -- just sturdy and with you at all times. Tripods become increasingly important when shooting with cropped sensor DSLR's (like the 20D) because cropping telephoto images results in increased blur. A 300mm lens suddenly requires the same shutter speed as a 420mm lens on a film or full frame sensor camera.

I have two different tripod solutions I use most frequently: the first is the standard (and rather heavy) Bogen 3021. It is aluminum and tall enough to shoot without stooping. It weighs quite a bit and is my choice when shooting from the car or for taking to a zoo or animal sanctuary.

The lightweight option is the much more expensive Gitzo 1128 Moutaineer. It is carbon fiber so not only does it have a cool name, it is made from high tech materials. All kidding aside, the lighter weight comes at a cost; it is shorter than the Bogen 3021 but it's nearly as sturdy as its metal counterpart. Highly recommended for those looking for light weight, sturdy design, and don't mind spending money on some real security when shooting telephoto or long exposures.

Quick Release Ball Head

Manfrotto ProBall 306

Manfrotto 3021

Bogen 3021 Tripod

Manfrotto 3018

Bogen 3018 Monopod

Gitzo 1128 Tripod

Gitzo 1128 Mountaineer Carbon Fiber Tripod

420ex Flash

Canon Speedlite 420EX

 

Back to Top


Accessories

I like camera bags that don't look like camera bags. I have two versions of the Domke J-series camera bag and can't recommend them enough. They are made from extremely durable canvas and have a beefy design that can take a lot of punishment. The insides are customizable with a large divided insert that can be moved around to create just the storage space needed. The two end pockets have removable padded inserts that can either be used to store a flash unit, charger, filters, or any other accessory imaginable.

Domke J1 Bag

Domke J-1 Camera Bag

Domke J2 Bag

Domke J-2 Camera Bag

Back to Top

Last Update: December 8, 2007


Copyright © Rich Adams 2005
All Rights Reserved